DOMESTIC.
B & L (1216)---15264-6000-5-91
fice or Individual.
ming Six F.
Date.
1892
19 Jan
previous Paper.
5.75
Hong Kong
No 2656
Conduct
(Subject.)
0.0.
614
2656
REC?
REG 10 FEB 32
of Major Dempster
**
Expresses opinion that Major Dempster was not to blame with regard to the rice supplied to prisoners
(Minutes.).
M. Hanfield.
I do not quite see that this letter disposes of the charges (or even part of them) made ...
The W.O. (in 2275) asked for any further information in possession of the Dept. on the subject of the "rice Episode."
Should we refer to Sir W. des Voeux for pardon...
5.mg.11
9.1176.
this I say that Sir W. des Vœux is hardly likely to throw doubt on whether there would be much advantage in making further reference to him.
I would send copy of this, I say
fordon
I would not consult Jen?
C.P.D. 1170
DOMESTIC.
B & L (1216)---15264-6000-5-91
fice or Individual.
ming Six F.
Date.
1892
19 Jab
previous Paper.
5.75
Stong Kong
NO 2656
Conduct
(Subject.)
0.0.
614
2656
REC?
REG 10 FEB 32
of Major Dempster
**
Expresses opinion that Major
Dempster
was not to blame with
bregard
të the
о
atmay
rice supplied to prisoners
(Minutes.).
M. Fanfield.
Ido not quite see that this letter dispores of the charges for
Even part of them) made
Thn W.O. (in 2275) asked
in
95299 Jer
any further infi in possessin
on the subject of the of the Dept.
"
"rice Episode.
Should we
Voeux
refer to Sir W. des
to fen- fordon
5.mg.11
9.1176. this I say that Sir W.
I would sand copy of this, 2 say
ist des Vœux is Imoto illa that fare doubt whattier 12 there would be much advantage in mathing further
subsequent Paper
reference to him.
fordon
I would not consult Jen?
C.P.D. 1170
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.